Trouble leaving comments?

By -
I tried leaving a comment to Ari's post and for some reason my comment is not being published even though I am logged in. Any ideas anyone?

Comments

  1. moshe weinerOctober 9, 2011 at 3:47 AM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Eli GutnickOctober 9, 2011 at 3:54 AM

    I looked it up and received this suggestion:

    You have a problem with authentication, and with cookie filtering.

    First, make sure that your browser is up to date.

    Next, try a different login procedure.
    1. Login to Blogger using "www.blogger.com".
    2. Do not check "Remember me".


    If that does not help, try a second time..
    1. Clear cache, cookies, and sessions (not just cache or cookies) - then restart the browser.
    2. Login to Blogger using "www.blogger.com".
    3. Do not check "Remember me".


    Alternatively, stop filtering "third party cookies", in your browser and on your computer. That's the best solution, overall - but you may have to search for the cookie filter(s) that affect your use of Blogger / Google.

    You can have a cookie filter:
    1. In a native browser feature.
    2. In a browser add-on.
    3. In a security feature, on the computer.
    4. In a network device.
    Please, note that any and all cookie filters must be set properly. If you have more than one cookie filter affecting access to Blogger, all filters must be set properly, before an improvement will be seen.

    Try the commenting / cookie test, by commenting on 2 of my blogs, if you like.

    Read, for details:

    Comments Disappear When "Post Comment" Is Hit:

    http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2011/09/blog-readers-report-comments-supposedly.html

    Use Up To Date Browsers, For Best Results:

    http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2011/08/new-blogger-browser-support-policy-and.html

    Login To Blogger, Differently:

    http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2011/05/blog-owners-unable-to-login-to-blogger_27.html

    Why Third Party Cookies Are A Necessity:

    http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2011/06/cookie-filtering-and-commenting-ability.html

    Test For Cookie Filtering Problem:

    http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2010/10/testing-for-problem-with-cookies.html

    Please, Don't Filter Web Content, Excessively:

    http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2011/07/unfilter-web-selectively.html

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

shin in "Alter Rebbe" script

By -
Image
Both the Shulchan Aruch Harav and the Mishnah Brurah use similar terminology when describing the importance of the shin being "pointy" on the bottom and all three branches of the letter shin meeting at a point or "chad" at the bottom of the letter. There is a strong foundation in Halacha for this and for the bottom of the shin to be flat like a moshav (base) is considered questionable (Pri Megadim) and definitely not Kosher Lechatchillah. It is worse if the moshav is very wide, but it is still questionable if it is lechatchillah if there is a thick noticeable base rather than a chad. Even for Sephardim, who lechatchillah make an angular base, it is still important that the base is indeed on a (significant) angle. If the base is flat, even if all three branches of the shin come out of the base  connected , as in the top picture, it is problematic.  It is worse in the bottom picture below where the right head/ branch comes out of the right part of the base and the m
Read more

Not a "khaf"

By -
Image
This gave me a "Safrut smile"... OK, I realise that this is not Ktav STaM, however it is interesting what happens when graphic/font Hebrew becomes too stylised. Case-in-point, a colleague and I were visiting the mayor's office in the Gaza Belt region of Shaar HaNegev (adjoining Sderot). He is new to reading Hebrew and pronounced the welcome sign as " brooning " or " broobing " (instead of the intended " brookhim ". I replied that he was more correct than the graphic designer, as the letter meant to be a " khaf " was closer to a halakhic "Nun" or "Bet", and had this been Ktav STaM, the letter would likely be considered pasul as a "Khaf".
Read more