Does anyone recognize this Ksav?

By -
The image below comes from a heavily water damaged half-sefer someone gave me last night. The section I have runs rougly from Parsahat Shmini until the end and is written in 60 lines without vavei ha'amudim which leads me to say German but I didn't think Yekkes wrote like this.

Comments

  1. Alberto AttiaAugust 5, 2013 at 4:02 AM

    Hi Yitzhak,
    This Sefer is very likely from Chekoslovakia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. YitzchakAugust 5, 2013 at 8:47 AM

      Thank you.

      Would you be able to point at any unique features that tipped you off?

      Delete
  2. aaaAugust 5, 2013 at 11:30 AM

    German style

    ReplyDelete
  3. Alberto AttiaAugust 5, 2013 at 1:44 PM

    Some key features are the rounded SHINS and the right curving feet of the KUFS, among others.

    ReplyDelete
  4. BenyominAugust 5, 2013 at 6:53 PM

    I restored a sefer with ksav and ink condition very, very similar to this one about three years ago. The shul that had it said that it came from Bohemia around 1850. So, based on the similarity I'd say this sefer probably came from SE Germany or the Czech Republic as well.

    ReplyDelete
  5. SholomGAugust 6, 2013 at 9:39 AM

    The Zayins on the second line are a good example to what is mentioned here (in the last paragraph).

    ReplyDelete
  6. Avraham Chaim BloomenstielAugust 9, 2013 at 2:28 PM

    I 2nd Binyomin. Spot on.

    The Zayins, Shins, and legs of the lange nun are typical.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Not a "khaf"

By -
Image
This gave me a "Safrut smile"... OK, I realise that this is not Ktav STaM, however it is interesting what happens when graphic/font Hebrew becomes too stylised. Case-in-point, a colleague and I were visiting the mayor's office in the Gaza Belt region of Shaar HaNegev (adjoining Sderot). He is new to reading Hebrew and pronounced the welcome sign as " brooning " or " broobing " (instead of the intended " brookhim ". I replied that he was more correct than the graphic designer, as the letter meant to be a " khaf " was closer to a halakhic "Nun" or "Bet", and had this been Ktav STaM, the letter would likely be considered pasul as a "Khaf".
Read more

shin in "Alter Rebbe" script

By -
Image
Both the Shulchan Aruch Harav and the Mishnah Brurah use similar terminology when describing the importance of the shin being "pointy" on the bottom and all three branches of the letter shin meeting at a point or "chad" at the bottom of the letter. There is a strong foundation in Halacha for this and for the bottom of the shin to be flat like a moshav (base) is considered questionable (Pri Megadim) and definitely not Kosher Lechatchillah. It is worse if the moshav is very wide, but it is still questionable if it is lechatchillah if there is a thick noticeable base rather than a chad. Even for Sephardim, who lechatchillah make an angular base, it is still important that the base is indeed on a (significant) angle. If the base is flat, even if all three branches of the shin come out of the base  connected , as in the top picture, it is problematic.  It is worse in the bottom picture below where the right head/ branch comes out of the right part of the base and the m
Read more