extended yud

By -
The yud is to long extended. I would passel it.

Comments

  1. AharonDecember 30, 2013 at 1:28 PM

    I don't disagree, but I do admire your courage.

    (In any case, the second VeHayu might need a Kotz added to the Yud.)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yerachmiel AskotzkyDecember 30, 2013 at 5:27 PM

    I question whether it is wide enough to pasel.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yosef Chaim BerkowitzDecember 31, 2013 at 8:57 AM

    I wouldn't be so quick to passul, it's regel is bending inwards & a tinnuk would most likely read it correctly,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AharonDecember 31, 2013 at 9:05 AM

      Not so sure. If it would be the top of a Vav, there would be hesitation about if it's a Reish. It's MUCH wider than any Vav in that Ksav. A Tinok might read this as a Yud, only because what else could it be. The Tinok might do so even if this were 50% longer, with a nice Kotz top and bottom, and a nice Regel.

      Delete
    2. Yosef Chaim BerkowitzDecember 31, 2013 at 9:13 AM

      Yes, if it were a vav that would be a reish, however it is not and it also can't be mistaken for a reish, it therefore should remain a sheilas tinnok, as with a shinu tzurah.
      Were it longer it would be worse, and we may not rely on a tinnok if we know he is clearly wrong.

      Delete
  4. YankevDecember 31, 2013 at 11:22 AM

    Shaylas Tinok

    ReplyDelete
  5. moshe weinerJanuary 1, 2014 at 1:42 AM

    I am not only concerned in regard to tzuras haos (as all agreed there is at least a shaylas tinok involved), but also a dimensional change.
    A yud is a nekuda, here it is a kav IE a gag. So what Aharon said in regard to reish-vav is a problem, to my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. YankevJanuary 2, 2014 at 10:33 AM

      Would you also be machmir if a nun had a rosh that was that wide, even if the moshav were extended well beyond the rosh and therefore no chashash of a beys?

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog