MEM looks like PEY Afuha
- Get link
- Other Apps
By
Unknown
-
- Get link
- Other Apps
How about the Bais of Uleovdo?
Popular posts from this blog
Not a "khaf"
This gave me a "Safrut smile"... OK, I realise that this is not Ktav STaM, however it is interesting what happens when graphic/font Hebrew becomes too stylised. Case-in-point, a colleague and I were visiting the mayor's office in the Gaza Belt region of Shaar HaNegev (adjoining Sderot). He is new to reading Hebrew and pronounced the welcome sign as " brooning " or " broobing " (instead of the intended " brookhim ". I replied that he was more correct than the graphic designer, as the letter meant to be a " khaf " was closer to a halakhic "Nun" or "Bet", and had this been Ktav STaM, the letter would likely be considered pasul as a "Khaf".
shin in "Alter Rebbe" script
Both the Shulchan Aruch Harav and the Mishnah Brurah use similar terminology when describing the importance of the shin being "pointy" on the bottom and all three branches of the letter shin meeting at a point or "chad" at the bottom of the letter. There is a strong foundation in Halacha for this and for the bottom of the shin to be flat like a moshav (base) is considered questionable (Pri Megadim) and definitely not Kosher Lechatchillah. It is worse if the moshav is very wide, but it is still questionable if it is lechatchillah if there is a thick noticeable base rather than a chad. Even for Sephardim, who lechatchillah make an angular base, it is still important that the base is indeed on a (significant) angle. If the base is flat, even if all three branches of the shin come out of the base connected , as in the top picture, it is problematic. It is worse in the bottom picture below where the right head/ branch comes out of the right part of the base and the m
shaylas tinok
ReplyDeleteI've been given tshuvos in the past that such a tziyor is fixable so long as the churtem is above the moshav of the chof
ReplyDeleteI've been given tshuvos in the past that such a tziyor is fixable so long as the churtem is above the moshav of the chof
ReplyDeleteR. Eli where did u write about it? Can u send a link?
DeleteI've been given answers in the past that a chof and long vov is ok as a mem provided the connection is up on the top and not low down. But it's probably not a bad idea to ask a shailo anyway since no doubt each case is unique
DeleteI've been given answers in the past that a chof and long vov is ok as a mem provided the connection is up on the top and not low down. But it's probably not a bad idea to ask a shailo anyway since no doubt each case is unique
DeleteI vote Pasul: It's an interesting design but it's not a Mem. More like a kind of Tzadi Sofit.
ReplyDeleteShailos chacham. I wouldn't fix or ask a tinok without first asking a shaila.
ReplyDelete