Help shaaloh on a tof. I was writing and this taf got filled in if someone could answer i would really apreciate it.
How about the Bais of Uleovdo?
Popular posts from this blog
shin in "Alter Rebbe" script
Both the Shulchan Aruch Harav and the Mishnah Brurah use similar terminology when describing the importance of the shin being "pointy" on the bottom and all three branches of the letter shin meeting at a point or "chad" at the bottom of the letter. There is a strong foundation in Halacha for this and for the bottom of the shin to be flat like a moshav (base) is considered questionable (Pri Megadim) and definitely not Kosher Lechatchillah. It is worse if the moshav is very wide, but it is still questionable if it is lechatchillah if there is a thick noticeable base rather than a chad. Even for Sephardim, who lechatchillah make an angular base, it is still important that the base is indeed on a (significant) angle. If the base is flat, even if all three branches of the shin come out of the base connected , as in the top picture, it is problematic. It is worse in the bottom picture below where the right head/ branch comes out of the right part of the base and the m
Ink, Kosher vs. non-Kosher
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
The rule is that if the inside is an upside down V and the top of the V is pointy ie the two raglayim are touching each other at that point without any gug (to square off the top of the V)then it is a shinuy tzurah. So I was instructed by Rav Friedlander. Thefefore this case its hard to be machshir.
ReplyDeletePerhaps Reb Moshe would like to pasken
Someone showed in the book mishnas hasofer page tzatik alef a yalkut sofer at the end that he is machshir
ReplyDeleteany feedback would be appreciated in yalkut he seems to be medameh a top part of a letter to a bottom one i wonder what was rabbi friedlanders moker to be machmir i even think in this case there is a part which goes a little bit on a lesser slant
ReplyDeleteworse case you can still go back from end of Shma and be megarrer until the tav assuming you did not write the next parsha of vehaya. Theres no shem HaShem. Are these rabbenu tam ? To me the tsurah is still a tav.
ReplyDeletethese are rabeinu tam already wrote vehaya
ReplyDeleteI think it must be shown to a posek
ReplyDeleteRabi vazner paskened that ot is kpsher and can be scraped off
ReplyDeleteRabi vazner paskened that ot is kpsher and can be scraped off
ReplyDelete