Change in RT

By -
Why is it that only recently we in chabad started leaving space at end of shema in RT?
Why the change from before when they finished until end of line?

Comments

  1. moshe weinerJuly 23, 2014 at 3:56 PM

    When was the custom in chabad to finish Shema [of RT] till the end?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Eli GutnickJuly 23, 2014 at 11:23 PM

    It was never official custom but it seems it was the norm for a period of time. Many Chabad sofrim seemed to write the R"T parsha of vehoya ki yeviecha like rashi (so more than nine osiyos gedolos - ie distincltly Chabad) and shema went until the end of the line. So these were definitely minhag Chabad parshiyos. (Vehoya Im was done in the same way its done today.)

    So that was the spacing a lot of chabad chassidim seem to have in their rabbeinu tams from a particular vintage when this spacing was popular, I'm guessing around the 1960's.

    Although by parshas shema makes no difference halachically (by R"T) how much space if any is left at the end of shema, yet for some reason, today, virtually all Chabad sofrim write uniformly with a space of 9 large letters, (like Rashi).

    What Yosef is asking is what caused this change - of what seemed to be a common practice.

    ReplyDelete
  3. moshe weinerJuly 24, 2014 at 12:37 AM

    Rabbi Landau (Bnei Brak) says in his fathers name (R. Yacov Landau) that RT should finish shma till the end, so maybe the sofrim mentioned wrote according to this shita.
    see what I wrote http://hebrewstam.blogspot.co.il/2013/12/blog-post_18.html,
    http://hebrewstam.blogspot.co.il/2012/06/blog-post_8471.html (end)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Y T-baumJuly 29, 2014 at 8:20 PM

      Thank you, perhaps a Shiur on that tshuva?

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

shin in "Alter Rebbe" script

By -
Image
Both the Shulchan Aruch Harav and the Mishnah Brurah use similar terminology when describing the importance of the shin being "pointy" on the bottom and all three branches of the letter shin meeting at a point or "chad" at the bottom of the letter. There is a strong foundation in Halacha for this and for the bottom of the shin to be flat like a moshav (base) is considered questionable (Pri Megadim) and definitely not Kosher Lechatchillah. It is worse if the moshav is very wide, but it is still questionable if it is lechatchillah if there is a thick noticeable base rather than a chad. Even for Sephardim, who lechatchillah make an angular base, it is still important that the base is indeed on a (significant) angle. If the base is flat, even if all three branches of the shin come out of the base  connected , as in the top picture, it is problematic.  It is worse in the bottom picture below where the right head/ branch comes out of the right part of the base and the m
Read more

The different ways of forming the"Hefsek Parshas Stuma" in tefillin parshiyos.

By -
Image
Following Ari's post, I have cut and pasted an article I wrote for a local publication some time ago on this very issue. I think it sums up this issue and the various shittos. I also suggest Rav Yonason Hershlags kuntres on this topic called "stumah shebestam". The different ways of forming the"Hefsek Parshas Stuma" in tefillin parshiyos. Introduction There is a common misconception that the only difference between the different minhagim (customs) of tefillin parshiyos is the ksav (font) they are written in. For example if a person is Sephardic, the ksav will be "Vellish", a script that is unique to Sephardic Jews; If one is of traditional Ashkenazic and non-Chassidic background, then he would usually get the "Beis Yosef" script;  If one is "Chassidic", he would get the "Arizal" script, etc.  While this is correct, there are also different opinions and minhagim on how to make the spacing between the parshiyos of th
Read more