Tikkun for Yud in an Azkara
this yud in the Shem needs an oketz but first-- does it have proper tzura to make the tikkun in a mezuzah?
How about the Bais of Uleovdo?
Popular posts from this blog
Bizarre! Mezuzah found written in כתב העברי הקדום
Does anyone know the story of this "mezuzah"? Pictures if it are circulating, with people saying it was found on someone's house (even though in the picture it looks like it has never been rolled).
Someone else said they saw it for sale in a Judaica shop.
Sounds like a practical joke to me, but there's nothing funny about it.
Someone else said they saw it for sale in a Judaica shop.
Sounds like a practical joke to me, but there's nothing funny about it.
Ink, Kosher vs. non-Kosher
We all know that there is no ancient source that requires ink to be מן המותר בפיך . Possibly, as said here before, because in the olden days ink was always מן המותר בפיך and the question was never raised. It was probably self-evident. Nowadays, no decent Rav will approve an ink which is not מן המותר בפיך . Who was the first one to raise this question? Was it raised because of animal ingredients or because of non-kosher wine?
מותר לתקנה יש בה צורת יו"ד, רק חסר בה עוקץ שמאל של ר"ת
ReplyDeleteI concur. There are those who feel strongly that if the regel does not have a kulmus It's a psul in the tzurah. They envoke the opinion of the Daas Kedoshim who makes such a diyuk in the Alfa Beita.
ReplyDeleteI completely disagree as does Rav Weiner in his sefer as well as others.
I would recommend extending the regel a drop first to avoid any possibility of the uketz which you will add in being the same length as regel.
also, a tip: it looks like the ink is to watery. Let it thicken a bit.
DeletePesach is this your ksav? Kol hakavod, it's looking better and better
DeleteAs mentioned, the only issue is the lack of the oketz R"T. Theoretically the short regel could be left as is but to not risk a psul and while at it, to be yotzeh the Mikdash Me'at, extend the regel slightly then add the oketz.
ReplyDelete