Removing Atzi Chaim
is there any hakpada not to remove atzi chaim in order to make is easier to take on a plane?
How about the Bais of Uleovdo?
Popular posts from this blog
Not a "khaf"
This gave me a "Safrut smile"... OK, I realise that this is not Ktav STaM, however it is interesting what happens when graphic/font Hebrew becomes too stylised. Case-in-point, a colleague and I were visiting the mayor's office in the Gaza Belt region of Shaar HaNegev (adjoining Sderot). He is new to reading Hebrew and pronounced the welcome sign as " brooning " or " broobing " (instead of the intended " brookhim ". I replied that he was more correct than the graphic designer, as the letter meant to be a " khaf " was closer to a halakhic "Nun" or "Bet", and had this been Ktav STaM, the letter would likely be considered pasul as a "Khaf".
shin in "Alter Rebbe" script
Both the Shulchan Aruch Harav and the Mishnah Brurah use similar terminology when describing the importance of the shin being "pointy" on the bottom and all three branches of the letter shin meeting at a point or "chad" at the bottom of the letter. There is a strong foundation in Halacha for this and for the bottom of the shin to be flat like a moshav (base) is considered questionable (Pri Megadim) and definitely not Kosher Lechatchillah. It is worse if the moshav is very wide, but it is still questionable if it is lechatchillah if there is a thick noticeable base rather than a chad. Even for Sephardim, who lechatchillah make an angular base, it is still important that the base is indeed on a (significant) angle. If the base is flat, even if all three branches of the shin come out of the base connected , as in the top picture, it is problematic. It is worse in the bottom picture below where the right head/ branch comes out of the right part of the base and the m
Have you tried calling the airline? They may give you permission to take it on board even with eitz chayims. (Not that this answers your question but it's always the best option).
ReplyDeleteIt seems that one should try the most not to remove the atzei chayim because of the law "ain moridin", and this is considered horada b'kedusha, even temporarily.
ReplyDeleteObviously if there is no option, it probably can be done for the sake of the need of the sefer (see Rema YD 290).
I recall the bnei yona in discussion whether woman can sew on the eitz chaim, brings the rosh that the eitz of the seferr tora in the aron in be is hamikdosh must of been removed each time,and it's impossible that they made the Torah posul each time,therefore he concludes that it doesn't make it posul.
ReplyDeletePlease review the source since I've seen it a long time ago.
I recall the bnei yona in discussion whether woman can sew on the eitz chaim, brings the rosh that the eitz of the seferr tora in the aron in be is hamikdosh must of been removed each time,and it's impossible that they made the Torah posul each time,therefore he concludes that it doesn't make it posul.
ReplyDeletePlease review the source since I've seen it a long time ago.